Through B Izzak

KUWAIT: Opposition MPs the day before today submitted a movement calling to convene a distinct consultation subsequent Sunday to speak about the “violations within the military fund”, lower than every week after a distinct tribunal acquitted a former premier, a former protection minister and different best officers of embezzling tens of hundreds of thousands of dinars.

The 13 lawmakers who signed the petition referred to as on Nationwide Meeting Speaker Marzouq Al-Ghanem to ask the Audit Bureau to speak about its record at the graft case that concerned the embezzlement of greater than KD 150 million from the fund. They also referred to as at the speaker to ask Sheikh Hamad Sabah Al-Ahmad, the son of the overdue Amir, Sheikh Mohammad Al-Abdullah Al-Mubarak, the minister of Amiri Diwan, and Sheikh Ali Al-Jarrah Al-Sabah, the previous minister of the Amiri Diwan to listen to their testimonies at the case.

However MP Obaid Al-Wasmi, head of the Meeting’s criminal and legislative committee, stated the regulation does no longer allow the Meeting to ask those personalities to the particular consultation, including he’s going to publish some other movement to rectify the error. There was no remark thus far from the opposite lawmakers who submitted the movement at the so-called mistake.

The particular ministers’ tribunal ultimate week acquitted former high minister HH Sheikh Jaber Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah, former protection minister Sheikh Khaled Al-Jarrah Al-Sabah and 7 former and present protection ministry officers concerned within the high-profile embezzlement case. The courtroom primarily based its verdict on a letter from the Amiri Diwan which stated overdue Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah was once conscious about the cash taken from the fund, which was once used to serve Kuwait’s nationwide pursuits.

In the meantime, MP Muhalhal Al-Mudhaf the day before today referred to as for abolishing the particular ministers’ tribunal which tries ministers at the grounds that every one persons are equivalent and will have to be attempted in the similar courtroom, including there is not any want for the particular tribunal.